Most people know that the religious roots of Christmas can
be found in the great redemptive event of Jesus Christ’s birth or incarnation,
which is just a theological term that refers to the deliberate act of the
second person of the Trinity emptying himself of his glory and taking on human
nature. The wonder of this event is most commonly depicted through the
religiously rich pageantry of the nativity scene. But in the multitude of
cooing baby Jesus pretenders that would make even Ricky Bobby proud, one thing
is often lost: Christmas really is for losers.
Rembrandt's Adoration of the Magi |
Known for Disadvantage
Don’t take my word for it. Jesus says so himself. When the question of whom he came to save arises, he is unambiguous, "It is not those who are well who need a physician, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance" (Luke 5:31-32). Throughout his ministry, Jesus maintains that his people are not marked by their power, wealth, or attractive appearance but rather by their disadvantage, their lack of worldly wealth, and their service.
Don’t take my word for it. Jesus says so himself. When the question of whom he came to save arises, he is unambiguous, "It is not those who are well who need a physician, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance" (Luke 5:31-32). Throughout his ministry, Jesus maintains that his people are not marked by their power, wealth, or attractive appearance but rather by their disadvantage, their lack of worldly wealth, and their service.
When Jesus speaks of life in his kingdom, his ethics are
diametrically opposed to the ethics of the Roman-ruled world into which he was
born. Instead of seeking their own advantage, Jesus calls his followers to
strive to lose their lives for the sake of others. Success in the life to
come springs from loss in the present world: "Whoever seeks to preserve
his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life will keep it" (Luke
17:33). Jesus’ point is never that financial, physical, or relational wealth is
somehow evil but rather that faith worked out in service and worship is where
true value lies.
For Jesus and his followers, this was a way of life...and death.
Rather than a picture of a cute child in surroundings as
rustic as an Anthropologie showroom, the nativity
scene points to the lowly manner in which God stepped into this world. The Son
of God was a child of scandalous circumstances, born to an unwed mother, and
raised in the Judean version of flyover country (John 1:46). Jesus was not esteemed
during his early ministry for having any physically attractive features. He was
not tall or strong or royal in appearance (much like his similarly unbecoming
ancestor King David, see 1 Sam 16:7). In fact, God has always worked this way,
choosing for himself people who are the least and the fewest by the normal
standards (Deut 7:7). Take for instance the future
suffering servant described by the prophet Isaiah (Isa 53:2). This
servant, probably best interpreted as a future, ideal Israel, is described as
one who is without "form or majesty that we should consider him, and no
beauty that we might desire him." Of course, in Christian reading, Jesus
is the ideal servant of whom these ancient prophecies speak, making these
qualities true of him.
Jesus' Followers
The followers of Jesus were likewise marked by loss in life;
many of them suffered and died as a result of their association with him. Jesus
himself lived and spoke as one who confounded contemporary notions of success
and power. Even the wonder and sweetness of his birth story is disturbed by the
shadow and manner of his death on the cross. He was a child of scandal who grew
into a man of sorrows.
When Jesus talks about his kingdom to come, he says that it
will be the poor, the sick, the homeless, and the hungry who are harbingers of
his presence (Matt 25:44-45). In other words, the manner in which the least of
his people are received says something about our disposition toward the king
himself. It is safe to say that this is not how Caesar describes his own kingdom.
Yes, Christ also speaks of coming again one day in glory and
power, but until that time, he and his people ought to be known as those who
disadvantage themselves for the sake of others, those who lose their lives that
they may gain it. That is why Christmas really is for losers.
Christmas and Jesus are indeed for losers. Yet you add at one point that Jesus would never say that financial, physical, or relational wealth are evil. So the wealthy winners can have Jesus also, as long as they become "losers" through some kind of sacrificial service (like helping at a food pantry)?
ReplyDeleteEarlier in Luke, Jesus portrays poor disciples who hunger and mourn and are rejected and hated like the prophets before them (Lk. 6:20-23)--definitely losers--and contrasts them with the rich who feast and laugh and are spoken well of by all (Lk. 6:24-26). The latter are false prophets, and their financial, physical, and relational wealth are depicted as negative (evil).
Thanks for the comment. I think the passage you cite is clearly dealing with true and false prophecy and the fact that true prophets who suffer oppression as a result of their faithfulness are to be imitated and admired. Jesus is calling his audience to remain true in the face of affliction, not to seek out affliction as an end in itself, as you seem to read it. Case in point, 6:22 includes a blessing on those who are insulted because of the name of Christ. One ought not seek insult for no good reason, but if one is faithful and insulted as a result, than that person may be encouraged by the testimony of past prophets who suffered the same way. Being insulted is not righteous in itself but only if it is "because of the Son of Man" as the passage says.
ReplyDelete